Start here · Book
Good Strategy/Bad Strategy
A clear distinction between strategy and goals, slogans, or ambition lists, organized around the strategy kernel.
Visit the original sourceDirector capability · Management topic
Concentrate effort through a diagnosis, guiding policy, and mutually reinforcing actions.
Editorially reviewed
Strategy is a response to a consequential challenge. It is not a list of aspirations, a collection of projects, or a target with no account of what makes the target difficult.
A useful strategy concentrates effort. It names the decisive features of the situation, chooses an approach that addresses them, and coordinates actions that reinforce one another.
The diagnosis should simplify without becoming a slogan. It identifies the few forces that explain why the desired outcome is difficult now: a market shift, constraint, capability gap, incentive, customer behavior, structural conflict, or other causal condition.
Separate observations from interpretations. State uncertainty and competing explanations. If the diagnosis could describe any organization, it is too generic to guide a specific choice.
The guiding policy defines how the organization will approach the challenge. It establishes priorities and boundaries without prescribing every action.
Good policy creates exclusion. “Improve customer experience” excludes little. “Reduce time to first value for small customers by standardizing onboarding and declining bespoke launch work” guides choices and names a trade-off.
State what will not be pursued. A strategy that preserves every existing priority has not concentrated effort.
Translate policy into a small set of actions that support one another. Assign owners, sequence dependencies, and identify the capability or management system each action requires.
Inspect the current portfolio for contradictory commitments. A standardization strategy paired with incentives for bespoke revenue may fail even when every initiative is executed well.
Name the outcome, earlier signals, guardrails, and assumptions whose failure would trigger review. Strategy should be stable enough to coordinate action and revisable enough to respond to evidence.
Do not treat every short-term variance as a reason to pivot. Agree in advance which changes would invalidate the diagnosis or make the policy inappropriate.
Write a strategy kernel for one live organizational challenge.
Revise for clarity before turning the kernel into a larger plan.
Good Strategy/Bad Strategy supplies the diagnosis, guiding-policy, and coherent-action kernel. Playing to Win expands strategy into linked choices about aspiration, where to play, how to win, capabilities, and management systems.
Use the frameworks to force choices. Completing either book does not establish strategic judgment.
You may be ready to record Lead when you can:
These prompts support a proficiency decision; they do not confer one.
Systems thinking & leverage strengthens the diagnosis. Decision writing makes the logic inspectable, and Influence across boundaries builds commitment without hiding trade-offs. Continue to Investment cases & benefit ownership and Portfolio choices & stop decisions to fund the strategy rather than merely announce it.
Curated sources
Resources support observation and practice. Finishing one does not automatically establish capability proficiency.
Start here · Book
A clear distinction between strategy and goals, slogans, or ambition lists, organized around the strategy kernel.
Visit the original sourceGo deeper · Book
Turns strategy into linked choices about aspiration, where to play, how to win, capabilities, and management systems.
Visit the original source